TV

Will HBO’s new ‘Harry Potter’ series be better than the books and films?

Will HBO’s Harry Potter series surpass the films that came before it, or perhaps, the original books themselves?

Harry Potter is a beloved franchise for many. From the book series to the films, it has accumulated a loyal fanbase of millions worldwide. 

But with the announcement of a new HBO series remaking the original books, the Harry Potter community has questioned whether a reboot is needed so soon. 

Can the magic of the franchise be recreated once more? Film News Blitz writer Priya O’Reilly gives her views.

The TV series vs. the original films

When comparing the upcoming television show to the movie franchise, the TV format holds a clear advantage.

Film adaptations demand ruthless cutting. 

To keep runtime around two to three hours, the original movies had to drop massive subplots. 

Fan-favourite elements such as Peeves the Poltergeist, S.P.E.W. (Hermione’s Society for the Promotion of Elfish Welfare), the tragic history of the Gaunt family, Neville’s parents at St. Mungo’s, and the deep backstory of the Marauders were either completely omitted or reduced to brief mentions.

A long-form streaming series gives creators room to breathe. 

Showrunners can dedicate entire episodes to character relationships, quiet moments at Hogwarts, and complex magical lore. 

The expansion of the character Ginny Weasley is also an exciting prospect for the TV Show; many criticised the films for reducing her to a “bland, passive background figure” instead of showing her as a “fierce, witty character.”

Furthermore, visual effects, television budgets, and storytelling formats have evolved dramatically since The Philosopher’s Stone hit theatres in 2001. 

HBO’s pedigree for prestige world-building suggests Hogwarts will feel more grounded, sprawling, and immersive than ever before.

Now here is a list of all the films in case you haven’t already seen them; while they may be dated, they have a certain magic to them that is undeniable:

  1. Harry Potter and The Philosopher’s Stone (2001)
  2. Harry Potter and The Chamber of Secrets (2002)
  3. Harry Potter and The Prisoner of Azkaban (2004)
  4. Harry Potter and The Goblet of Fire (2005)
  5. Harry Potter and The Order of the Phoenix (2007)
  6. Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (2009)
  7. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 (2010)
  8. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 (2011)

They are currently available free of charge over on ITVx.

READ MORE – Film news: ‘Harry Potter’ is back in cinemas for 25th anniversary

Side-by-side film stills from Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. On the left, Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger look onwards in their Hogwarts uniforms; on the right, Harry Potter wears round glasses and a Gryffindor scarf while holding Hedwig the snowy owl on his gloved arm.

The TV series vs. the books

Surpassing the original novels, however, is a much more difficult feat.

Rowling’s books succeeded not just because of their plot, but because of the reader’s intimate journey inside Harry’s internal monologue. 

A television screen can show action and dialogue, but it struggles to replicate the inner psychological texture of prose.

Furthermore, book readers built their own visual interpretations of Hogwarts, Quidditch, and the characters long before any screen version existed. 

Nostalgia creates a protective barrier around the novels that no adaptation can fully dismantle.

Where the TV series could elevate the books is in areas where the prose was restricted by Harry’s narrow point of view:

  • Expanded Perspectives: Showing events happening elsewhere in the Wizarding World while Harry is in class or asleep.
  • Fleshed-Out Antagonists: Deeper exploration of Death Eaters, the Ministry of Magic’s political decay, and Voldemort’s rise to power.
  • Enhanced Dynamics: Age-accurate casting (such as Snape and the Marauders in their early 30s) providing stronger emotional nuance.

The verdict

Will the new Harry Potter series be better than the films and books that came before it?

It is unlikely to replace the books, which remain the foundational bedrock of the entire Wizarding World. 

Reading allows an imaginative partnership between author and reader that visual media cannot duplicate. 

And for some who grew up with the magic of the films, the show may not replace the nostalgia they may feel with the old actors. 

However, the series stands a genuine chance of becoming the definitive screen adaptation. 

By blending modern visual effects, television pacing, and the patience to explore every nook and cranny of the lore, HBO’s series can fix the narrative shortcuts of the movies. 

If executed with heart and fidelity, it won’t replace what came before; it will complete it.

READ NEXT – TV news: HBO confirms season two renewal for ‘Harry Potter’

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular

To Top